Ne
Charlton Athletic and the media, Madrid daily life and the quiz team.
Saturday, February 25, 2006 Overshadowed Newcastle United 0 Charlton 0The only midweek Premiership fixture, but no one was remotely interested: Charlton were, before this game, 12th, and still are, but for the British sporting press, this was and is of no importance; what they did take the trouble to point out, once any reference to the game had been unearthed from all the comment about the Champions' League, Chelsea's pitch (not for the first time either) antics, Arsenal's victory in Madrid and so forth, was that Newcastle had been "held" by Charlton; that they had nevertheless moved up a place, and so on. Even my own friends congratulated Charlton vicariously, through me, on their away point, once they had asked me the result, sometimes as long as two days afterwards, if they did so at all. But why? The Premier League table shows both teams just below the middle of the table, with Charlton on 34 points and Newcastle on 33, and before the game they had one fewer each. So why the assumption that Newcastle v Charlton was akin to what, in the minds of the ITV commentators on Tuesday night, Real Madrid v Arsenal was? (Apparently, all the childish gurgling with excitement might have led you to believe it was Altrincham winning at Santiago Bernabeu, not Arsenal).I can only put it down to the blithe assumption, which I referred to last time, that everyone regards Newcastle as a great big enormous and, more to the point, successful, club, rather than a fairly average to boring one which just happens to be based in a city which, unlike Sheffield; Manchester; Birmingham; Liverpool and even Nottingham and Bristol, for heaven's sake, has no other league club to divide the support. Excuses mount up time after time for their failure to achieve: bad managers; lots of players injured and so on. But if Charlton's directors know a good manager when they've got one, while that loud-mouthed idiot in charge of Newcastle doesn't, well whose fault is that? And all clubs have injuries, after all.It's the script thing; someone somewhere has decided that Newcastle are basically a world-beating side who are having hard times. Even Michael Owen and our own once-beloved Spotty Parker have fallen for this one. There was great relief when Graeme Souness departed, and a feeling that now Newcastle would revert to type under the Very Wonderful Glenn Roeder (but don't mention his name to Burnley fans), aided and abetted by the Positively Saintly Alan Shearer. And lo! Newcastle managed two or three wins, albeit one of them a rather fortunate 1-0 home win against a lower-league team (take note, everyone, Southampton aren't in the Prem any more) in the Cup, only to have this winning run halted by mean ol' Charlton when the new regime's run of success might so easily have continued.Reading proper match reports, I concluded that a draw was the fairest result, and that for every Newcastle near miss recorded by the BBC reporters, there were similar near misses which unaccountably went unmentioned, by the Charlton forwards. On paper there was no reason why Charlton could not have won quite easily, and yet... I give up.On a cheerier note, the dreaded Lawro has been predicting more positively for Charlton lately, and correctly foresaw the Brentford result, though not the exact score. I contacted my fellow-scribe Frankie Valley, who designed the logo atop my page, but who has dropped it from the new design of his own, to see whether the campaign goes on or not. He tells me that Lawro isn't going to go away, so I am wondering whether to remove the logo. Maybe when I've thought of something else to replace it; how about Let's Kick Newcastle United Out Of Football? Wouldn't bother me; at least everyone would have to shut up about them. Anyway, for today's match at home to Aston Villa, Lawro has a 2-1 outcome, and Frankie, who has taken up the prediction lark too, has 2-0. So I shall await events later today before deciding exactly who ought to be kicked out of football. Not Frankie, though, I hasten to add.Quiz matters in some detail next week, David, and I can't remember the exact score, anyway. posted by Jonathan Blake @ 15:53 0 comments 0 Comments: Post a Comment << Home Reference Links Frankie Valley All Quiet in the East Stand (Inspector Sands) Addicks Championship Diary (Wyn Grant) New York Addick Livescore Charlton Athletic FC Latest Posts Where's the Romance? 4 Goals For Nothing and 4 Points Down I Was So Looking Forward To Tonight Low Expectations? Double Negative So Many Imponderables Narrow Squeaks What Next? Smoke Screens God Rest Ye Merry, Gentlemen - Archives - May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 March 2008 April 2008 free hit counter About Me Name: Jonathan Blake Location: Argüelles, Madrid West, Spain "Jonathan Blake" came into being when I was supplementing my teaching salary by editing a small tourist magazine which was distributed free every month to visitors at a five-star hotel in the centre of Madrid. The production and layout were all done by non-English speakers, and that meant that all the writing had to be done by me. My own name appeared as editor and also over what I regarded as the best piece of the month. "Jonathan Blake" (the first name and surname of two acquaintances from university) was the name I made up (I thought then, and still do, that it has a nice ring to it) for second-best pieces and general features. It's nice to be able to resurrect Jonathan after all this time to help me out with the writing.... View my complete profile
Newcastle United 0 Charlton 0The only midweek Premiership fixture, but no one was remotely interested: Charlton were, before this game, 12th, and still are, but for the British sporting press, this was and is of no importance; what they did take the trouble to point out, once any reference to the game had been unearthed from all the comment about the Champions' League, Chelsea's pitch (not for the first time either) antics, Arsenal's victory in Madrid and so forth, was that Newcastle had been "held" by Charlton; that they had nevertheless moved up a place, and so on. Even my own friends congratulated Charlton vicariously, through me, on their away point, once they had asked me the result, sometimes as long as two days afterwards, if they did so at all. But why? The Premier League table shows both teams just below the middle of the table, with Charlton on 34 points and Newcastle on 33, and before the game they had one fewer each. So why the assumption that Newcastle v Charlton was akin to what, in the minds of the ITV commentators on Tuesday night, Real Madrid v Arsenal was? (Apparently, all the childish gurgling with excitement might have led you to believe it was Altrincham winning at Santiago Bernabeu, not Arsenal).I can only put it down to the blithe assumption, which I referred to last time, that everyone regards Newcastle as a great big enormous and, more to the point, successful, club, rather than a fairly average to boring one which just happens to be based in a city which, unlike Sheffield; Manchester; Birmingham; Liverpool and even Nottingham and Bristol, for heaven's sake, has no other league club to divide the support. Excuses mount up time after time for their failure to achieve: bad managers; lots of players injured and so on. But if Charlton's directors know a good manager when they've got one, while that loud-mouthed idiot in charge of Newcastle doesn't, well whose fault is that? And all clubs have injuries, after all.It's the script thing; someone somewhere has decided that Newcastle are basically a world-beating side who are having hard times. Even Michael Owen and our own once-beloved Spotty Parker have fallen for this one. There was great relief when Graeme Souness departed, and a feeling that now Newcastle would revert to type under the Very Wonderful Glenn Roeder (but don't mention his name to Burnley fans), aided and abetted by the Positively Saintly Alan Shearer. And lo! Newcastle managed two or three wins, albeit one of them a rather fortunate 1-0 home win against a lower-league team (take note, everyone, Southampton aren't in the Prem any more) in the Cup, only to have this winning run halted by mean ol' Charlton when the new regime's run of success might so easily have continued.Reading proper match reports, I concluded that a draw was the fairest result, and that for every Newcastle near miss recorded by the BBC reporters, there were similar near misses which unaccountably went unmentioned, by the Charlton forwards. On paper there was no reason why Charlton could not have won quite easily, and yet... I give up.On a cheerier note, the dreaded Lawro has been predicting more positively for Charlton lately, and correctly foresaw the Brentford result, though not the exact score. I contacted my fellow-scribe Frankie Valley, who designed the logo atop my page, but who has dropped it from the new design of his own, to see whether the campaign goes on or not. He tells me that Lawro isn't going to go away, so I am wondering whether to remove the logo. Maybe when I've thought of something else to replace it; how about Let's Kick Newcastle United Out Of Football? Wouldn't bother me; at least everyone would have to shut up about them. Anyway, for today's match at home to Aston Villa, Lawro has a 2-1 outcome, and Frankie, who has taken up the prediction lark too, has 2-0. So I shall await events later today before deciding exactly who ought to be kicked out of football. Not Frankie, though, I hasten to add.Quiz matters in some detail next week, David, and I can't remember the exact score, anyway.
posted by Jonathan Blake @ 15:53 0 comments
Post a Comment
<< Home
"Jonathan Blake" came into being when I was supplementing my teaching salary by editing a small tourist magazine which was distributed free every month to visitors at a five-star hotel in the centre of Madrid. The production and layout were all done by non-English speakers, and that meant that all the writing had to be done by me. My own name appeared as editor and also over what I regarded as the best piece of the month. "Jonathan Blake" (the first name and surname of two acquaintances from university) was the name I made up (I thought then, and still do, that it has a nice ring to it) for second-best pieces and general features. It's nice to be able to resurrect Jonathan after all this time to help me out with the writing....
View my complete profile