Ne
Charlton Athletic and the media, Madrid daily life and the quiz team.
Saturday, April 16, 2005 The Rule of Six We came second again at the quiz last Monday night, though we were missing Tony. Well we weren't missing him in the sense of longing for his presence, just that, as he was acting as quizmaster, he wasn't on the team. Obviously if he had been on the team we'd have won easily, as he was the one who knew all the answers, as our most recent signing wittily pointed out.So we were reduced to 5 players, while our eternal rivals, who like to call themselves The Old Farts, though they aren't any of them actually old at all, well not in my book anyway, sailed home again. The other team we consider to be dangerous rivals have taken to bringing girlfriends and wives from time to time, and this week they almost all did, which meant that they ended up with more than the maximum permitted of six. So they had to split into two smaller teams and thus did not come anywhere near winning, which is the problem with the desire to make the quiz a social event on the one hand, but also to win it, on the other. Luis says that any number who can squash themselves round a table should be allowed, provided the final points score is divided by the number of players in the team, and while this seems not unreasonable, it does conjure up a vision of one of our genial quizmasters tapping away at a calculator and announcing the scores with up to four decimal points, which would perhaps be a trifle bizarre.In fact there was a team with eight or nine players, but as they are relatively new, and always come last, we turned a blind eye to this, but in general the rule of six is fair enough, I think, even though it means that sometimes friends and colleagues of ours who say things like "I'll drop down to the quiz tonight" have to be told that if they do, they might find themselves in a scratch team of complete strangers. What they think is that it is a social event and their presence or absence is relatively immaterial; what we think is that we are a carefully evolved team who want to win. Therein lies the difference. And we haven't won for a bit, but like Alan Curbishley at my beloved Charlton, I still think the mix is perfectly all right. It is just that, as the current cliché has it: 'you can't win 'em all'; and you can't. It doesn't mean that anything is seriously wrong.I am making no predictions for the Charlton v Bolton match, due to start in 15 minutes, beyond remarking that Charlton always do better when people haven't been assuming they will roll the opposition over, so fingers crossed. posted by Jonathan Blake @ 15:49 0 comments 0 Comments: Post a Comment << Home Reference Links Frankie Valley All Quiet in the East Stand (Inspector Sands) Addicks Championship Diary (Wyn Grant) New York Addick Livescore Charlton Athletic FC Latest Posts Goals Make a Difference Almost Normal Light Blue Blues EasyJet Latest; Biased Referee and Quiz Update Sublime to Ridiculous Curbs Should Stay Put.... and Does! Good Career Move? Eighth Again Eating my Words Ninth Again - Archives - May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 March 2008 April 2008 free hit counter About Me Name: Jonathan Blake Location: Argüelles, Madrid West, Spain "Jonathan Blake" came into being when I was supplementing my teaching salary by editing a small tourist magazine which was distributed free every month to visitors at a five-star hotel in the centre of Madrid. The production and layout were all done by non-English speakers, and that meant that all the writing had to be done by me. My own name appeared as editor and also over what I regarded as the best piece of the month. "Jonathan Blake" (the first name and surname of two acquaintances from university) was the name I made up (I thought then, and still do, that it has a nice ring to it) for second-best pieces and general features. It's nice to be able to resurrect Jonathan after all this time to help me out with the writing.... View my complete profile
We came second again at the quiz last Monday night, though we were missing Tony. Well we weren't missing him in the sense of longing for his presence, just that, as he was acting as quizmaster, he wasn't on the team. Obviously if he had been on the team we'd have won easily, as he was the one who knew all the answers, as our most recent signing wittily pointed out.So we were reduced to 5 players, while our eternal rivals, who like to call themselves The Old Farts, though they aren't any of them actually old at all, well not in my book anyway, sailed home again. The other team we consider to be dangerous rivals have taken to bringing girlfriends and wives from time to time, and this week they almost all did, which meant that they ended up with more than the maximum permitted of six. So they had to split into two smaller teams and thus did not come anywhere near winning, which is the problem with the desire to make the quiz a social event on the one hand, but also to win it, on the other. Luis says that any number who can squash themselves round a table should be allowed, provided the final points score is divided by the number of players in the team, and while this seems not unreasonable, it does conjure up a vision of one of our genial quizmasters tapping away at a calculator and announcing the scores with up to four decimal points, which would perhaps be a trifle bizarre.In fact there was a team with eight or nine players, but as they are relatively new, and always come last, we turned a blind eye to this, but in general the rule of six is fair enough, I think, even though it means that sometimes friends and colleagues of ours who say things like "I'll drop down to the quiz tonight" have to be told that if they do, they might find themselves in a scratch team of complete strangers. What they think is that it is a social event and their presence or absence is relatively immaterial; what we think is that we are a carefully evolved team who want to win. Therein lies the difference. And we haven't won for a bit, but like Alan Curbishley at my beloved Charlton, I still think the mix is perfectly all right. It is just that, as the current cliché has it: 'you can't win 'em all'; and you can't. It doesn't mean that anything is seriously wrong.I am making no predictions for the Charlton v Bolton match, due to start in 15 minutes, beyond remarking that Charlton always do better when people haven't been assuming they will roll the opposition over, so fingers crossed.
posted by Jonathan Blake @ 15:49 0 comments
Post a Comment
<< Home
"Jonathan Blake" came into being when I was supplementing my teaching salary by editing a small tourist magazine which was distributed free every month to visitors at a five-star hotel in the centre of Madrid. The production and layout were all done by non-English speakers, and that meant that all the writing had to be done by me. My own name appeared as editor and also over what I regarded as the best piece of the month. "Jonathan Blake" (the first name and surname of two acquaintances from university) was the name I made up (I thought then, and still do, that it has a nice ring to it) for second-best pieces and general features. It's nice to be able to resurrect Jonathan after all this time to help me out with the writing....
View my complete profile